More on the Texas Bigfoot Conference
Posted by: Loren Coleman on September 30th, 2009
Various individual overviews of the Texas Bigfoot Conference are coming in from people who were there, as well as via the media. The event built a bit of stream before it even happened.
I’m not sure if the final count is in, but I understand that the meeting was attended by nearly 360, about 100 more than last year. The TBRC seemed happy with these numbers in a new city, and plan to build on this scientifically successful gathering in the future.
A long Tyler, Texas Morning Telegraph article about parts of the Texas Bigfoot Conference was published on Sunday, and entitled, “Hundreds Gather In Tyler To Discuss Belief In Bigfoot.”
Here’s what the Tyler paper said about…
Bob Gimlin, the man who partnered with Roger Patterson to record the first sighting of Bigfoot, was at the conference. He signed autographs and took photos with admirers.
“I came down here because I feel people are interested in coming to these conferences and I want to enlighten thing about my experience,” he said.
Patterson recorded the infamous video of a supposed Bigfoot on Oct. 20, 1967. Gimlin said rights were sold to different companies in 1972 and since then, the famous image of an ape-like creature in mid-stride has surfaced around the world. He said he has made no money from it. Gimlin recounted that day at a creek in northern California.
“I was pretty much a skeptic at the time,” he said. “We were hoping to see one but didn’t think we’d see one. Some people claim it was fake, that it was a man wearing a suit. It’s been hashed out for 42 years.”
Gimlin said he was frightened by the creature that’s estimated to be about 7-4 and weighed between 500 and 800 pounds.
“My heart was jumping up and down inside my body,” he said. “When you see something that’s nearly 8 feet tall covered with hair and is not supposed to exist, it makes you pretty scared.”
He added, “I know it was real. This is America, where you can have whatever thought you want and say what you think.”
Meanwhile, Mike at the Texas Cryptid Hunter gives a sharply focussed summary of some of the lecture events.
For example, Mike observed:
Primate biologist Esteban Sarmiento gave a very informative talk on great ape anatomy. He discussed physical characteristics of chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, and orangutans and then compared what is known about these great apes versus physical characteristics and locomotion demonstrated by the Sasquatch filmed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin at Bluff Creek in 1967.
(I’ll have more to say about Esteban and others I met there, in a future posting at Cryptomundo.)
Mike added:
Maybe the true high point of the conference was the banquet that evening featuring adventurer, wildlife author, and naturalist Peter Matthiessen as keynote speaker. Matthiessen is revered by wildlife experts the world over for his research on the snow leopard of the Himalayas. Matthiessen held the audience rapt with stories of his adventures. He discussed his own sighting of what may very well have been a Yeti in a remote and, at that time, previously unexplored Himalayan valley, his work with early Bigfoot researchers such as John Green and Rene Dahinden, and his plans for writing a book on the subject of the Sasquatch. It was truly a once in a lifetime chance to hear this man speak.
Peter Matthiessen, who is 82 (born May 22, 1927, in New York City) and quite healthy, did give an excellent talk, sharing Bigfoot material he apparently had not told of before, publicly. As you may be aware, he has not spoken too openly about his Bigfoot research since his 1983 book, In The Spirit of Crazy Horse, went into years and years of litigation.
The Oglala Sioux people are quoted (in his In the Spirit of Crazy Horse) about their relationship with their local variety of Bigfoot. The Lakota (western Sioux) call them chiye-tanka (chiha-tanka in Dakota or eastern Sioux) – chiye means “elder brother” and tanka means “great” or “big.” In English, though, the Sioux usually call him “the Big Man.”
“There is your Big man standing there, ever waiting, ever present, like the coming of a new day,” Oglala Lakota Medicine Man Pete Catches told Mathiessen. “He is both spirit and real being, but he can also glide through the forest, like a moose with big antlers, as though the trees weren’t there… I know him as my brother… I want him to touch me, just a touch, a blessing, something I could bring home to my sons and grandchildren, that I was there, that I approached him, and he touched me.”
Matthiessen talked of Bigfoot but not in as great detail as he has already written about those in the Dakotas. At the banquet, it truly was enlightening to watch his nuances and shift in focus from the Dakotas to reports to the West, which often occurred more in tone than content.
Mike has published a variety of images from the event too, here.
Sharonlee published her blog and photos here.
More photos were published here.
You only get one guess on this quick quiz: With whom do you think most people wished to have their pictures taken, throughout the weekend? 🙂
Meanwhile, back in Maine…
Join the past and present patrons in supporting the International Cryptozoology Museum, as it opens in downtown Portland, Maine.
Please click on the button below (not the one up top) to take you to PayPal to send in your museum donation.
If you wish to send in your donation via the mails, by way of an international money order or, for the USA, via a check (made out to “International Cryptozoology Museum”) or money order, please use this snail mail address:
Loren Coleman, Director
International Cryptozoology Museum
PO Box 360
Portland, ME 04112
Thank you, and come visit the museum at 661 Congress Street, Portland, Maine 04101, beginning November 1, 2009!!
About Loren Coleman
Loren Coleman is one of the world’s leading cryptozoologists, some say “the” leading living cryptozoologist. Certainly, he is acknowledged as the current living American researcher and writer who has most popularized cryptozoology in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Starting his fieldwork and investigations in 1960, after traveling and trekking extensively in pursuit of cryptozoological mysteries, Coleman began writing to share his experiences in 1969. An honorary member of Ivan T. Sanderson’s Society for the Investigation of the Unexplained in the 1970s, Coleman has been bestowed with similar honorary memberships of the North Idaho College Cryptozoology Club in 1983, and in subsequent years, that of the British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club, CryptoSafari International, and other international organizations. He was also a Life Member and Benefactor of the International Society of Cryptozoology (now-defunct).
Loren Coleman’s daily blog, as a member of the Cryptomundo Team, served as an ongoing avenue of communication for the ever-growing body of cryptozoo news from 2005 through 2013. He returned as an infrequent contributor beginning Halloween week of 2015.
Coleman is the founder in 2003, and current director of the International Cryptozoology Museum in Portland, Maine.
In the Patterson-Gimlin film we have a piece of physical evidence (the film) which has been analyzed to death. The latest computer aided analyses show that a human wouldn’t fit inside the supposed suit, and probably couldn’t walk that way. We have plaster casts made from impressions in the sand where the subject of the film walked. We have, finally, the words of the only man living who was there. He says categorically that he really didn’t believe in Bigfoot and that he was scared when he saw the animal, a totally reasonable response.
And we still have people who refuse to admit the validity of the search for the Sasquatch.
I hate to say it, because I don’t like the implications, but the fact is we need a body. Personally, I would rather leave them alone, or watch from a distance as the Sas went about their business. But only a body on a dissecting table will really ever satisfy the ‘scientific community’. Photos won’t do it because photos can be faked (see the continuing controversies about the P-G film), DNA tests on hair or tissue samples won’t do it because we don’t have a base-line DNA model for the Sas (requires a body everyone agrees is a Sas). Only a full body on a block will ever really end the controversy.
I wish it were not so.
I’m going to guess Bob Gimlin! Now what do I win Loren LOL?
Bob Gimlin. Hands down. I forgot my camera while packing, so I didn’t take any photos. But everyone I saw who did, wanted one with Gimlin. The man really is a rock star.
I’m no Bigfoot Groupie; it’s all about the animal with me and nothing about the personalities.
However. You can bet I got Matthiessen and Gimlin.
There is no way that anyone who says anything nice about Bob Gimlin can prepare you for how honest, straight up and just plain good the man really is. Everything that’s human about you says this guy wouldn’t lie. About anything.
I have to admit to expecting that those two might make token appearances and split. I couldn’t have been farther off. Everything that happened – straight up until they left town after the conference – they were right in the middle of, and totally involved with anyone they were talking to. That has to impress you.