Tom Slick Expeditions
Posted by: Loren Coleman on December 7th, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75cYxUOc59o
Tom Slick: True Life Encounters in Cryptozoology.
Fresno: Craven Street/Linden Press, 2002.
Tom Slick and the Search for the Yeti.
Boston: Faber and Faber, 1989.
About Loren Coleman
Loren Coleman is one of the world’s leading cryptozoologists, some say “the” leading living cryptozoologist. Certainly, he is acknowledged as the current living American researcher and writer who has most popularized cryptozoology in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Starting his fieldwork and investigations in 1960, after traveling and trekking extensively in pursuit of cryptozoological mysteries, Coleman began writing to share his experiences in 1969. An honorary member of Ivan T. Sanderson’s Society for the Investigation of the Unexplained in the 1970s, Coleman has been bestowed with similar honorary memberships of the North Idaho College Cryptozoology Club in 1983, and in subsequent years, that of the British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club, CryptoSafari International, and other international organizations. He was also a Life Member and Benefactor of the International Society of Cryptozoology (now-defunct).
Loren Coleman’s daily blog, as a member of the Cryptomundo Team, served as an ongoing avenue of communication for the ever-growing body of cryptozoo news from 2005 through 2013. He returned as an infrequent contributor beginning Halloween week of 2015.
Coleman is the founder in 2003, and current director of the International Cryptozoology Museum in Portland, Maine.
On watching the video I was most displeased at the nonchalant way Peter Byrne talks about the plan to STEAL part of the yeti hand from the monastery and then carried out such a devious act like it’s just a part of research.
With scruples like that, what sort of other funny business is he up to in his research.
Astonishingly shocking values system there!
Sorry Loren, you can’t say ‘took’ part of the yeti hand. Call it what it was…stealing!
Have to agree with YowieLover here. Either one stands by one’s ethics and can, possibly, prove one’s theories, or all possible deductions/inductions become suspect.