New Bigfoot Video From Texas?
Posted by: Craig Woolheater on June 29th, 2007
3TV Exclusive: New Bigfoot video surfaces
Exclusive new videotape may show elusive Bigfoot creature
Bigfoot hunters are eating their hearts out. Cryptozoologists are hoping this new video may be the evidence they’ve sought. Skeptics are already dismissing it as another man in a monkey suit.
On a secret, secluded location in the north Texas woods, a video camera equipped with a night-vision lens captured something strange. A hunched-over figure moves among the trees. It travles fast, appearing to skirt the trunks and branches with ease, despite the pich-black of night. The figure traverses a ravine and then moves off-camera, with the crunching of branches and leaves to mark its passage.
Tom Biscardi of searchingforbigfoot.com is ecstatic at the image. He has a network of dozens of people who agreed to place the cameras on their properties across the United States. This video is apparently the first to yield results. Still shots show a figure that definitely looks ape-like. He’s sent the tape off for analysis and enhancement, and shared it exclusively with Arizona Tonight.Scott Davis
3TV Producer
Watch the video on the news station’s website here:
3TV Exclusive: New Bigfoot video surfaces
You can’t see much from the video, but it looks to be from the same folks in the Paris, TX area that were hawking some video footage through Jack Lapseritis a few years back.
They are now working with Biscardi, and apparently have now supplied him with some of their video footage.
Of course, they are also working with Joan Ocean, the Dolphin ET woman.
With 30 Bigfoot that write notes in English, it shouldn’t be hard to track at least one of them down.
See if any of the folks on the two websites look similar, even if their faces are pixelated out…
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005.
I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films:
OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.
Sigh.
You have got to be kidding me!
I take it I’m not the only one who can hardly see anything.
Can’t get the video to play. But judging by those comments I’m not missing anything….
It’s no P-G footage, is it?
The video wouldn’t play in Firefox but it did in Internet Explorer. It showed something moving but it was dark and unimpressive. When I replayed the video and attempted to zoom to 200% it became truly blurred.
I’m thinking this is 99.9% Biscardi scat.
I think we need to do what we never did for Patterson.
Get down on our knees in front of Bob Gimlin.
And say we’re sorry.
You just never know.
you all know whats going to happen dont you.
after 30 years of biscardi taking hoaxed pictures, thinking if we stick with this head made out of a 4 gallon ice cream bucket people will eventually believe us that this is really what a sasquatch looks like, it will be a bonafide hoaxer like biscardi who dumbfoundedly stumbles onto the gods proof.
but to get the proof i hope there is some justice in how it happens.
we can only hope that a love starved sasquatch sees tom biscardi in a gorilla suit and thinks he found the last female squatch and proceeds to impregnate poor tom in the suit. all the while dumbfounded fellow hoaxers film the whole scene with several different cameras and from many different angles.
alas biscardi finally gets a real sasquatch on film and free DNA as a bonus.
sweet karma.
I couldn’t see a thing , its to dark .
Good morning Sasquatchers…
If you venture out this weekend of the 4th….please remember to take your best digital camera on it’s highest resolution….watch where you put your hands and feet…optically zoom in and focus as tightly as possible paying attention to the shadows and darkest areas of any suspected activity…
When reviewing your images…take your time, while using the best monitor and software available. Kinko’s and your local public library can help. If you need help with your images, there are several folks who frequent this blog site who have the requisite skills and experience to evaluate and enhance your images.
If you are fortunate enough to encounter the big folks…talk to them while easing back out the same way you came…don’t run.
Never reveal the location of your sighting(s) or research areas…if you intend to investigate them further…trust no one until they are proven trustworthy.
Stay safe…live and let live…
ole bub and the dawgs
That’s discouraging. I thought we had one there.
It was too dark, too far, and too blurry.
It’s either hoaxed or it’s real, and we’ll never know for sure.
Like mitchigan said, it’s no P-G footage.
And so, we’ll just add one more to the pile.
Anyone laugh when they saw the “Jean-Luc’s Rendering from Joan’s description showing partial dematerialization” picture on that site?’
I will try to be nice about this one and just say that on my computer, there was really nothing in that video at all. A vague, blurry blob maybe, but I can’t even be sure if that is what is there or what I am anticipating to see. This is like staring at one of those mosaic images, hoping that what is hidden there will pop out at you. Does anybody here really see anything that is something to be excited about? In my opinion, any video that has to be watched many times to even make out that there is something there is pretty much worthless and is a conversation piece at best. I will wait until a clearer version becomes available to make any final judgement, but as it is now, this footage is poor in my opinion.
Speculating about a undefined, barely discernible blob is the kind of thing that is giving cryptozoology buffs a bad name, and I am a little disappointed that Biscardi would try to hype this up like this. I hate to be this firm, but sorry, as it is this footage is nothing at all to anyone who doesn’t care if it is a sasquatch or not. My personal litmus test as usual is show this to someone without telling them what they are supposed to be seeing and see what they think it is. I doubt there are too many that would see much at all here, let alone say “it’s a hairy hominid!”. Maybe it is Bigfoot, but I wouldn’t know that from what I see here. We’re going to have to do better than this.
Ivan Marx’s swan-lake-dancing-lame-bigfoot footage is more convincing than this. I admit that it would also be interesting to see the kinds of notes and the presents that Ms. Ocean’s sasquatch literati (in the literal sense) would leave Biscardi. I hae me doots they’d be pieces of quartz.
I can’t see anything.
I saw a faint blur noving in the bottom left corner but that was it.
I did here something interesting from the actor Brain Blessed when he was on telly yesterday talking about him going to mongolia in search of the Yeti. The Mongols told him that they often see groups of Yeti migrating from south Russia to northern Mongolia and the thing that surprised me they said they often have DOGS with them!
I saw something move. What it was I don’t know.
Why is it everytime something moves across the screen it’s a cryptid? Especially when it is so dark you can’t see it?
cmgrace: speculative answers to your question.
1) because the International Society of Cryptid Viewing hasn’t made a law against crap like this yet.
1a) because we need an International Society of Cryptid Viewing.
2) because cryptic means, well, dark!
3) because if it moves and you can’t see what it is, isn’t it by definition a cryptid? (Or is that a UF0?)
It does not matter, dear video/photo submitter, what YOU saw. No, really, it doesn’t. If you can’t relay that exactly to a random viewer, without the slightest chance of getting comments like those you see above, what you have is use-lay, as they ought to say in French if they don’t. (En anglais: gree-bage.)
And do you think we’ve seen the last one of these? Not with all the1/4-turns-short-of-finger-tights that there are out there, we haven’t.
Paul78: That’s ridiculous.
Which is, of course, one reason we shouldn’t rule it out.
Hey. Dogs evolved as camp followers. Is it really so farfetched that strays might do some pretty far straying onto the trail of something not only pretty manlike, OK, manlike enough for a hungry pooch, but really good at getting grub? Sure it is – about as farfetched as a totally wild polar bear suddenly appearing out of the white for some good-natured playtime with a chained husky. Which has been filmed. As have arctic foxes following polar bears around, for what is presumably a similar reason. (Speaking of animals that can be readily confused with yeti. 😉 )
Won’t know until we find out, will we?
hey everyone this is a very interesting possible new texas sasquatch filmfootage i do see something upright in the film but research study & enhandsments needs to done to it, im not saying its hoax or authentic just very interesting etc thats my opinion for now. thanks bill green 🙂
Paul78,
Could you provide more details about this TV program? Where do you hail from? And what was the subject matter, overall title of this TV program.
Any further elucidations would be quite helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Dogs with the Russian version of Sasquatch? While over here in North America, the tales are that the dogs usually are torn apart or thrown very far from the creature if they attempt to track it? Very interesting indeed….
I can’t see it.
What the?..Who the? It could be anything or anyone.. I saw nuttin but black.
I know one thing.. It was dark!
Another very dissapointing video with nothing to see! These YouTube videos are either too indistinct to make anything out or obvious frauds. NEXT!
I saw enough to determine it was a human-like figure, moving in a human-like way. Seemed thin and wiry to me, but that’s probably a bit speculative. What seems determinable to me is that it was a dark, man-like figure, with no obvious sign of hair or unusual anatomy (Broad shoulders, long arms, etc.) that moved in a way completely consistent with that of a human. Neither did it look particularly ape-like, in a more conventional Chimpanzee or Skunk Ape sense. My guess- It’s the usual from Biscardi.
Biscardi???? Not again…said the flower pot
I guess it was a slow news day for Channel 3.
Move along, please, nothing to see here…
I really enjoyed the nearly-opaque blue dot moving about in the nearly-pitch black forest.
Wait, I see… nothing. Again. Groan…
DWA: The way it was said was like they were their pets.
greenmartian2007:
I’m in the UK and Sadly it was on a program my sister watchs called loose women and it was just a general interview with him and what he is up to and he mentioned his expedition to find the Yeti, Mention they call it the almani man, the dogs and location which i have forgot. I don’t know if it was a personal journey or for Telly because Brian Blessed is just as famous for doing expeditions. Sorry
The only bigfoot I saw was in the comerical before the news peice. Sigh, once again, Blobsquatch.
If my sources are right, then this footage is several years old and hoaxed. It appears that this was shown to a group of folks several years ago in Oklahoma who deemed it a hoax then.