Colorado Grizzly Bear Hoax?

Posted by: Craig Woolheater on July 1st, 2007

Colorado Grizzly

This photograph of a grizzly bear sow and two cubs in the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness southwest of Aspen appears to be a “hoax,” according to Chris Servheen, a grizzly expert with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (courtesy photo)

Bigfoot, Nessy and grizzlies in Aspen

Next, perhaps, Bigfoot will be spotted at Carbondale’s Mountain Fair or the Loch Ness monster will disrupt the next regatta at Ruedi Reservoir.

An alleged sighting last fall of a grizzly bear sow and two cubs in the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness apparently belongs in that same, unbelievable category.

A photograph of the alleged sighting of the bears southwest of Aspen appears to be a “hoax,” according to Chris Servheen, a grizzly expert with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Word of the alleged sighting has circulated for months in some circles in Aspen and finally filtered its way to the Colorado Division of Wildlife in June.

Kevin Wright, the wildlife manager for the Aspen district, heard the rumors, traced the source and recently obtained the photograph of a grizzly sow and two cubs.

“We’ve got a lot of questions but we haven’t completely discounted this,” said Colorado Division of Wildlife spokesman Randy Hampton.

Here’s the story behind the photograph, as told to the wildlife division:

• A nanny for an Aspen family took a bus to the Maroon Bells one day last fall and embarked on a hike. The woman got lost and came across the sow and two cubs, took the picture, got frightened and high-tailed it back to the bus.

• The family she works for eventually downloaded the image to their computer, learned the story behind the picture and started circulating it among friends. Word of the alleged sighting and the picture made it to Wright this month.

• Wright interviewed the family. They claimed there was no way their nanny would have been in a position to take the shot any place other than the Maroon Bells area. The family is attempting to put Wright in contact with the woman, who is now in Florida.

The wildlife division wouldn’t release the name of the nanny or the family she worked for to The Aspen Times.

The investigation of the alleged sighting isn’t a high priority for the wildlife division, but something they want to address because of the rumors.

“It’s not a criminal investigation,” Hampton said. “We’re not knocking down doors on this one. We have to take people at face value.”

The interview with the nanny is critical to determine whether the “sighting” was legitimate Hampton said. Investigators want to know where the picture was allegedly taken and the circumstances surrounding it, he said. They want to visit the spot and to see if there is any sign of a grizzly bear.

The picture was taken in way where the bears are in focus but the landscape in the background is blurred. There are no distinguishing natural features that would allow Wright to verify a location.

“We’re skeptical. We’ve got questions,” Hampton said.

Their skepticism is warranted, said Servheen, coordinator the grizzly bear recovery program for the Fish and Wildlife Service in Missoula, Mont.

“I think I’ve seen that picture before,” he said, when The Aspen Times supplied him with a copy of the alleged bear sighting photograph. He circulated the image among friends to try to trace its origin. They believed it came from Denali National Park in Alaska and is several years old.

“That’s the kind of phograph that is taken in a national park where bears are used to being around people,” Servheen said.

The image appears to be taken from a camera with a telephoto lens, Servheen said. The nanny allegedly took it with a Sony Cyber-shot, a hand-held digital camera. Servheen said he cannot imagine how someone using that camera could get close enough to get the image that’s being circulated.

“We tell people to stay at least 100 yards away from grizzly bears,” he said.

Hampton said state wildlife officers wonder how a famously reclusive breed of bear would supposedly settle so close to a popular recreation area. The Maroon Bells area receives roughly 200,000 visitors during the warm-weather months. Hiking trails spiral all directions from Maroon Lake. The nanny supposedly hadn’t wandered far before stumbling across the sow and cubs.

The last confirmed grizzly bear sighting in Colorado was Sept. 23, 1979, in the San Juan Mountains. A female grizzly attacked an outfitter. He survived; the bear was located and killed.

Grizzly sightings aren’t rare, although they have been unconfirmed.

Two hunters reported spotting a grizzly sow and two cubs southeast of Independence Pass last fall – about the same time as the alleged sighting by the nanny at the Maroon Bells.

Wildlife officers checked the hunters’ claim by searching the wilderness area east of Aspen both on the ground and through the air. There were no signs of grizzly bears.

That sighting was roughly 22 miles east of Aspen. The Maroon Bells bus stop is 12 miles southwest of Aspen.

Hampton said is certainly no evidence that hikers, campers and backpackers are in any danger from a grizzly.Scott Condon

About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005. I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films: OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.


4 Responses to “Colorado Grizzly Bear Hoax?”

  1. mystery_man responds:

    Substitute the word “sasquatch” for “bear” and this could be a standard Bigfoot report. Weird. Hoaxing bear photos? What’s next?

  2. Coloradan responds:

    This looks like the kind of thing some people spread in order to scare “tourists” away. Just about any mountain community in Colorado (and lots of other places) is plagued with newcomers who want to keep everyone else out. “I was here first. You go away,” is the mentality. It is often expressed verbally, with a thick accent. Real mountain locals do not often behave this way, at least in my experience.

  3. MattBille responds:

    The photo, if taken as descibed, was clearly taken from a distance much too close for safety. I don’t see anything that says it’s not Colorado, although a botanist might spot some discrepansices in the plant life. It also seems odd that, if the photographer got close enough to take this shot, she took no pictures either while she was approaching the bears or while she was retreating.
    Having researched this issue a few years ago, I do think a couple of grizzlies, relicts or strays, do live in CO (the 1979 animal was a female and had given birth – where’s the cub?), but it’s hard to imagine there is a viable population.

  4. cmgrace responds:

    I have to say I live in CO and I am terrified about the black bears. I could just imagine running into a grizzly!

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|


Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest

Advertisers



Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin



Advertisement

|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.