Psychic Sasquatch Revisited
Posted by: Loren Coleman on April 28th, 2011
“Kewaunee and friend”
We note the preface is by Christopher Murphy.
What the author Kewaunee Lapseritis is saying about his own new book, just released:
Kewaunee’s new book is the ultimate book on the Sasquatch phenomenon. Because the Sasquatch are genuinely people not animals, Kewaunee is a crypto-anthropologist, not a crypto-zoologist.
He elaborates on why they are humanoid beings and their purpose here is based on 32 years (out of the 55 years researching them) interacting with the giants (and ETs). Kewaunee draw information from 187 witnesses who also experienced telepathic communication. Quantum physics that describe the reality of mental telepathy, invisibility, inter-dimensionalism, and other PSI phenomena, actually juxtapose psychic Sasquatch and ET behavior.
Kewaunee’s has been successful in his research because of his benign spiritual field methodology (no guns or cameras) not unlike Dr. Jane Goodall’s approach with chimpanzees – except the Sasquatch are highly evolved nature people, terrestrial, extraterrestrials, living inside giant–like bodies.
In his book, the forest giants reveal a salient message to humanity that the planet is dying at the hands of exploitative man and in 2012 there will be a huge shift in human consciousness that most earthlings are ill prepared to face. The Sasquatch people, who are the ultimate environmentalists, want to share their ancient wisdom with the human but few are listening.
There is a chapter on the Bigfoot/Et UFO connection, yet the UFO phenomenon is woven onto ever chapter since many of the Sasquatch work with several races of friendly Star People as they prepare to assist humanity for the coming cosmic earth changes.Kewaunee Lapseritis
I continue to maintain that to explain a zoological unknown with a parapsychological unknown does not make for a compelling logical explanation for the greatest cryptozoological mystery of modern times. Furthermore, to call oneself a “crypto-anthropologist” while not seeming to understand that anthropology acknowledges that humans are apes and that anthropologists study all higher primates equally, without bias, only goes to demonstrate a misinformed foundation in thinking upon which this book and the aligned “research” is based. As far as the book is concerned, if the above overview is any indication of the grammar and typos that occurs in the text itself, I am afraid we shall be seeing another badly edited self-published book entering the fringe Bigfoot literature. ~ Loren Coleman
Cover and book illustrations posted under fair use for critical review purposes.
About Loren Coleman
Loren Coleman is one of the world’s leading cryptozoologists, some say “the” leading living cryptozoologist. Certainly, he is acknowledged as the current living American researcher and writer who has most popularized cryptozoology in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Starting his fieldwork and investigations in 1960, after traveling and trekking extensively in pursuit of cryptozoological mysteries, Coleman began writing to share his experiences in 1969. An honorary member of Ivan T. Sanderson’s Society for the Investigation of the Unexplained in the 1970s, Coleman has been bestowed with similar honorary memberships of the North Idaho College Cryptozoology Club in 1983, and in subsequent years, that of the British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club, CryptoSafari International, and other international organizations. He was also a Life Member and Benefactor of the International Society of Cryptozoology (now-defunct).
Loren Coleman’s daily blog, as a member of the Cryptomundo Team, served as an ongoing avenue of communication for the ever-growing body of cryptozoo news from 2005 through 2013. He returned as an infrequent contributor beginning Halloween week of 2015.
Coleman is the founder in 2003, and current director of the International Cryptozoology Museum in Portland, Maine.
What a load.
Wow……someone forgot to take their meds.
Well, I certainly don’t believe bigfoot are friendly aliens here to help us all stop being white European males afraid of climate change. But—
Many years ago somewhere I read a strange bigfoot report. As I remember it, it was a man and woman walking along the edge of a big field. They both noticed a single small tree all by itself right in the middle of the field. To them the tree seemed out of place, seemed odd, and they both stared at it. As they stared, the tree—somehow—“morphed” in their vision and changed into a bigfoot. The bigfoot, then, turned and walked away across the field and disappeared into the trees on the other side of the field. The account in the original telling had the ring of truth to me and I accepted it and I still do. And it has completely changed my thinking about bigfoot. I have no idea what bigfoot is, but ever since reading this account I’ve been unable to think of bigfoot as a strictly zoology issue.
As far as this book stands, I would read it, but it is unknown if I could believe such craziness. Coming from a guy who has studied the phenomenon for 55 years has to have some credibility. I did read the Psychic Sasquatch years ago and it is an interesting take with an open mind to read the book. Although I would have to see it to believe it, or be contacted by one as he claims to have been many times. But I don’t even know if I would believe it with my own eyes! Bigfoot is as elusive as an extinct dinosaur, but I definitely do believe they are out there. As far as the skipping dimensions and shapeshifting, that could explain why no one sees them for long or why we have no evidence of a body. I suppose it could go hand in hand, because if that is true. then we would be dealing with literature that could support the UFO claim as well. All in all good entertainment!
Can someone explain to me what a “terrestrial extra-terrestrial” is?
Well, Loren, nothing really to add to what you say.
Except: the evidence I read seems refreshingly free of stuff like this. Where’s the huge volume of consistent reports? I’m guessing, not chronicled here.
markLouis: there is a very simple, rational explanation for the report you cite. The animal was stationary in the middle of the field, right? They said the tree looked odd, right? I’ve seen many an animal that “morphed” into a tree or stump or log or rock upon further examination – and a few “features” that moved, and “became” animals. This was the latter…and their take on it a very subjective evaluation that fed stuff they already were thinking about this.
When you give yourself a funny Indian-esque first name and wear a ponytail at his age (or what his age looks like from that drawing)…well, I’ll take you seriously. If you give me something serious, that is.
That “message to humanity” was crystal clear. It was delivered, to us, by us. In, um, 1970. We didn’t listen, then as now, because, well, we don’t like listening to bad news. Nothing more complex than that.