Seven Most Persuasive Analyses of the Patterson/Gimlin Film
Posted by: Christopher Noël on February 18th, 2014
My top seven most persuasive analyses of the Patterson/Gimlin Film in no particular order:
Whoever or whatever is walking in the Patterson/Gimlin film walks in a manner impossible for you or me to replicate.
About Christopher Noël
Christopher Noël is the author of Sasquatch Rising 2013 and editor of the newly released anthology How Sasquatch Matters: Writers Respond to the New Natural Order.
Christopher Noël holds a Master’s degree in Philosophy from Yale. Noël is a freelance editor (ChristopherNoel.info) and lives with his daughter in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom.
What an excellent collection of analyses. Thank you for gathering them here for us.
watched the bill mun’s one.
wow.
pretty badass
hard to dispute his findings…. they were pretty awesome.
makes me believe even more that PG was legit.
always wondered about that video since I was a kid.
it’s something that fascinated me then… and till this day.
Slam dunk. Night night suitniks.
Munns is definitely one of the most credible and qualified of those that have attempted to draw conclusions from the PG film… very hard to find fault with his analysis.
There is actually much more. For those that are interested, the entire (and exhaustive) Munns Report is available here.
“Ruptured hernia”. “Rupture” and “hernia” are synonymous, like saying “flaming fire”.
I told Bob Gimlin that the only reason they were successful in filming Patty that day was the fact that she was slowed down by the rupture of the muscle in her leg. They were tracking as many as seven Bigfoot and the others were probably waiting for her beyond the tree line. She was too slow and got caught in the open.
Thank you Goodfoot for your continued analysis of peoples repeated redundancy of descriptive terms.
Did that make you cringe? 🙂