Humboldt County Bigfoot Photo?

Posted by: Craig Woolheater on March 19th, 2013

humboldtbigfoot

Purported photo of a Bigfoot from Humboldt County in Northern California.

What do the Cryptomundians think?

About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005. I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films: OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.


18 Responses to “Humboldt County Bigfoot Photo?”

  1. Daniel Parks via Facebook responds:

    I swear these blurry pics are like the UFO ones…What Squatches generate magnetic fields too?

  2. Phil Puopolo via Facebook responds:

    looks like a bear

  3. Gary Hilton via Facebook responds:

    Bird.

  4. Dave Cornwell via Facebook responds:

    It’s very intriguing, but since it’s a static image with poor quality it’s useless.

  5. edsbigfoot responds:

    Wow! Pics everywhere:) Could be a black bear, the only thing that stands out is, if it is a sasquatch looking down like the narrator discusses, the shiny part on the top of the head reminded me of a podcast interview with a private investigator who saw some security cam footage of a sasquatch digging thru a garbage can behind a reservation casino in Oklahoma. The media was all over it, footprints were cast etc, the Natives on the reservation and at the casino wanted no one out there poking around, the footage of course disappeared, but the PI states that the weirdest part of the animal was how a light it walked under glowed off the top of its head, like it had a bald spot.

    Here is the link to the podcast, but it may be old news by now, and if its not ok to post these kind of links, just delete it and accept my apology:)

  6. Ragnar responds:

    Bird. Looks like the one from Kentucky.

  7. dconstrukt responds:

    wouldn’t call this one blurry… its actually a pretty good photo…. just the photo itself, there’s no context or a way to tell what it really is… could be a bear, bird… a dude or anything really.

    did say humbolt county… aka weed central…. and the fed’s and weed growers have been known to run around hiding in the mountains…. could be a dude in one of those hunting suits…

    who knows.

  8. Peter Von Berg responds:

    Oh come on, I can’t believe this one is being dragged out again. It was on television, for crying out loud. It’s a crow!

  9. squatchman responds:

    There is a possibility of it being a sasquatch, but I can’t rule out a bear or anything that lives in California.

  10. DWA responds:

    Whatever it is, it’s big. They should really have one of the building stills from the video up; otherwise, watch it.

  11. PoeticsOfBigfoot responds:

    Looks like a hollow stump to me.

  12. eyeofstrm responds:

    Just an observation. Look at the building at the top of the hill when the picture zooms out. This camera was not even level. If you level out the camera it would seem pretty impossible for a bigfoot or a human in a suit to crouch at this angle without rolling over and down the hill. By the way the skeptic in the video sounds like a real horses ass.

  13. Peter Von Berg responds:

    Let me clear this up if I can. This was on one of the Bigfoot shows on TV. If only I could remember which one. Nevertheless they showed how the object photographed was not twenty feet away or whatever, it was only about two feet away. It is not huge, it is tiny. It’s just a little bird, a crow. This was not a hoax. A photography expert explained to the guy who lived in the house how the spatial relations of his photograph worked and of how the object photographed was something small and only looked large.

  14. Tarzanboyy responds:

    That is the back end of someone’s pet emu or ostrich.

  15. PhotoExpert responds:

    Blobsquatch!

    Given the 394 x 276 pixel count on this photo, it will always remain a blobsquatch.

    If I had a higher resolution photograph, I might be able to do something with it. Trying to improve this image would just be a waste of my time.

    But just looking at the photo, it could be anything–rock, bear, stump, etc. And because there is only one photo, I could not even tell you if it is an animate or inanimate object we are viewing.

  16. Kopite responds:

    Looks like of like one of Patrick Beaton’s drawings of bigfoot.

  17. alan borky responds:

    Oh my god the final scientific proof of my hitherto unknown theory that Sasquatch’re fighting back against extinction by having sex with baseball mitts.

    Ew y’can even see the gleam of the slime!

    Craig going by the surrounding plants whatever that is it can’t be any larger than a baseball glove.

  18. Dr Kaco responds:

    Gary Hilton, Ragnar : I agree…..bird just like the Kentucky Trailcam image from Monster Quest episode.

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|


Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest

Advertisers



Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin



Advertisement

|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.