Bigfoot Breasts: Laryngeal Air Sacs?
Posted by: Loren Coleman on October 5th, 2010
In Darren Naish’s Tetrapod Zoology posting, “Pouches, pockets and sacs in the heads, necks and chests of mammals, part 1: primates,” (whew, I’m exhausted by the title already), he takes on Sasquatch breasts, a bit. (Being an academic, I understand that “Bigfoot, Boobs, and Bulges” won’t do for him but still…he does address the issue. I’m responsible for adding the illustrative material here, to spotlight his treatment, however. Cryptomundians have come to expect a high standard of visual accoutrements.)
Anyway, Naish says:
“The possible presence of hypertrophied laryngeal pouches has also been discussed a few times in the literature on Sasquatch (Krantz 1999, Meldrum 2006). If Sasquatch is a non-human ape, the presence of enlarged air sacs would be expected. Furthermore, it’s been suggested that the loud vocalisations inferred by some to be created by Sasquatches indicate the presence of giant, orangutan-like air sacs in this animal. Grover Krantz even considered the idea that the large, human-like breasts of ‘Patty’ – the subject of the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin film – might be partially inflated air sacs, but noted that this was more unlikely than the idea that they really are breasts (Krantz 1999).”
The specific quotation Naish is referring to from Krantz, in essence, is this one:
“Many years ago I suggested another possible explanation for those prominent bulges; they might be laryngeal air sacs of enormous size, and about half inflated in this film….If the Sasquatch had an exaggerated version of these pouches, they just might extend anteriorly and some distance down the chest. These could be inflated, then abruptly deflated (perhaps by pressing down on it with the hands) while exhaling a lungfull of air at the same time. Such a volume of air passing the vocal cords could help account for the extremely loud sounds they are reported to make. Actually I do not find this to be as likely an explanation as that they are breasts. I just think it is a good practice to look at every reasonable possibility – with this and any other phenomena.” – page 119 in Grover S. Krantz’s Big Footprints (Boulder: Johnson Books, 1992) and Bigfoot Sasquatch Evidence (Surrey, BC/Blaine, WA: Hancock House, 1999).
Krantz took quite a battering from the hominological debunkers about this suggestion, and it is clear he changed his tune about his theory, down through the years. Still, I often wondered if Krantz wasn’t influenced a little by Ivan T. Sanderson’s early thoughts on air sacs showing up in some ethnoknown, but unverified primates, and then retreated from the notion in the 1990s.
The booming calls tied to some of the great unknown apes, especially those which turn out to be relatives of the orangutans or the orangutans actually re-inhabiting their ancestral ranges, might still have something to do with laryngeal air sacs.
But Grover Krantz’s early attempts to explain away the breasts of the P-G Bigfoot as laryngeal air sacs probably belong in the dustbin of cryptozoological history. You know, it is the one containing Jon Erik Beckjord’s weird insights that the breasts of the Patty Bigfoot were really her holding an infant Sasquatch, and the recent theory about the Bigfoot in the film being a cradle-boarded California native Homo sapiens adult with a digging stick.
Regarding the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot’s breasts, it just may be a case of breasts merely being breasts.
Darren Naish’s sources:
Krantz, G. S. 1999. Bigfoot Sasquatch Evidence. Hancock House (Surrey, B.C. & Blaine, WA.)
Meldrum, J. 2006. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. Tom Doherty Associates (New York).
About Loren Coleman
Loren Coleman is one of the world’s leading cryptozoologists, some say “the” leading living cryptozoologist. Certainly, he is acknowledged as the current living American researcher and writer who has most popularized cryptozoology in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Starting his fieldwork and investigations in 1960, after traveling and trekking extensively in pursuit of cryptozoological mysteries, Coleman began writing to share his experiences in 1969. An honorary member of Ivan T. Sanderson’s Society for the Investigation of the Unexplained in the 1970s, Coleman has been bestowed with similar honorary memberships of the North Idaho College Cryptozoology Club in 1983, and in subsequent years, that of the British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club, CryptoSafari International, and other international organizations. He was also a Life Member and Benefactor of the International Society of Cryptozoology (now-defunct).
Loren Coleman’s daily blog, as a member of the Cryptomundo Team, served as an ongoing avenue of communication for the ever-growing body of cryptozoo news from 2005 through 2013. He returned as an infrequent contributor beginning Halloween week of 2015.
Coleman is the founder in 2003, and current director of the International Cryptozoology Museum in Portland, Maine.
I can understand (and so should anyone interested in this topic) the desirability of entertaining alternative explanations for phenomena when no evidence leads one to an explanation.
But it also makes sense to extrapolate from what is known; and with primates, doing that is to say that it’s worth betting lunch money that Patty is no Patrick.
(btw: from what I read of Naish, “Bigfoot, Boobs, and Bulges” would be right up his alley as a title.)
I’d say breasts. I’m always amazed at how little this is brought up by those who try to debunk PG. The breasts look so right and actually move realistically.
I pay close attention to detail. Are my eyes playing tricks on me or is there an image of a bearded man on Patty’s thigh in the second picture. Loren????
It is looking up at Patty’s Right arm. What a trip.
I apologize for commenting on something else in this discussion.
Can somebody steer me towards that site that has the stabilized frames of the Patterson film? I think what I’m going to do is forward the site to some plastic surgeons that specialize in breasts and breast reconstruction and ask their opinions of the whole thing.
sasquatch: actually, breasts are very frequently brought up by P/G debunkers.
They do so as part of what I call The Legend of The Omnipotent Hoaxer (LOTOH). OF COURSE Patty would have breasts, they say. THAT’S HOW THEY (who is “they”?) MAKE YOU THINK IT’S REAL. It’s just the touch The Omnipotent Hoaxer would think of! In fact, that’s what every piece of evidence is: another bit of brilliant skulduggery by OH!
And those who actually rely on evidence, e.g., scientists who have actually analyzed the film, rather than saying “it’s fake” and then trying futilely (i.e., without a shred of evidence to go on) to justify that, say what you do, to wit: Breasts move like that. Real ones.
I’ve never looked carefully until now, but are those nipples on Patty right exactly where they should be??