Cryptomundo
for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More

2 Responses to “Reminder: America’s Book Of Secrets: The Mystery of Bigfoot Tonight!”

1. airforce47 responds: June 1st, 2013 at 1:39 pm

   Greetings,

   I can confirm assertions made by other researchers on this program that the governments take action to confuse or destroy evidence about the existence of Sasquatch. In 1998 I had a telecon with a wildlife biologist who was leaving a job in DC and headed to a new position in WA state.

   Our conversation was officially off the record. However, he was aware of my family name and our involvement in early aviation. In our conversation he did admit to me that he knew the species existed having seen enough confidential reports to convince him and was aware that key people in government agencies knew or suspected the species exists.

   He did tell me the primary reason the wood products industry doesn’t want the species found is a real fear of what it might it might do via environmental protection laws.

   Please note that I’m prepared to testify to these facts at any hearing where needed. I remember his phone number was 202 something which I think is the DC exchange. I don’t recall his name since it was off the record but he had a guest blog post which caught my attention at the time.

   The question of the existence of the species will be answered in part later this year by the team from http://bigfootology.com/ Prof. Bryan Sykes and Dr. Michel Sartori plan on publishing their conclusions of their study in the Nov/Dec time frame. It’s my belief they will conclude that their DNA tests match those already performed by others including Melba Ketchum.

   If so, then they will show a mitochondrial maternal DNA pattern of Homo sapien female and an unknown fraternal primate DNA pattern. If this is the case it will finally scientifically uphold the existence of the species but it may very well turn out that a specimen body is still needed for classification.

   I recommend the show to anyone with an interest in the topic. It’s informative and does a good job of reporting the controversy but the subject is so vast it’s difficult to choose what to report in a given time frame. Also, the subject changes suddenly with each new finding or discovery. My best,

2. corrick responds: June 2nd, 2013 at 7:14 pm

   “I can confirm assertions made by other researchers on this program that the governments take action to confuse or destroy evidence about the existence of Sasquatch. In 1998 I had a telecon with a wildlife biologist who was leaving a job in DC … I’m prepared to testify to these facts at any hearing…I remember his phone number was 202 something which I think is the DC exchange. I don’t recall his name since it was off the record…”

   airforce47 thanks. That’s the kind of third-hand, unverifiable testimony that should finally shut up all those skeptics and scoftics.

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|