Large Sasquatch Caught on Video in Alberta!
Posted by: Craig Woolheater on January 31st, 2014
Out for a walk, at the rivers edge, we saw this. Before we got the video on it, it had walked a few feet, looked back at us, then crouched down.
This is a very real, very large Sasquatch caught on video by a river in Alberta! Watch in full screen and the highest quality!
About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005.
I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films:
OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.
Too short, bad acting.
Edit points at :04 and :20 are curious. Doesn’t mean it isn’t real, but curious, nonetheless.
Great video. When the animal turns to his right and walks away, the final step we can see seems to cover a very long distance. Good video .
Still, as a long time enthusiast I think we should be seeing many more images and vids from hunters stationary cameras.
Too far away to really tell, but she sheer bulk of the figure is definitely impressive. p.s. I know some of those posting about this video on youtube question whether a child would actually say “that is not human,”–but that’s a pretty weak critique, IMO, considering how sophisticated today’s media-saturated kids are.
Tracks?
Well, no hoax markers, and the relative absence of backstory is almost completely explained by the video.
I also have to wonder why anybody hoaxing would (a) want to give us almost no look at what appears an expensive ape suit and (b) slow down and stabilize it to help us shoot it down.
Can’t tell you. But I’d be interested in a visit to that site to collect more evidence.
(By a bigfooter, I mean.)
Because without that…just one more video.
Two quibbles: some shaky – from an evidentiary standpoint – camera manipulation and a “that’s not human” for something that if it wasn’t there doesn’t seem to be any reason to even think that.
The size of that would be hard to fake in my opinion
VERY interesting footage.
Agreed on the request for footprint follow-up.
…and the little girl says, “that was NOT a real human!” 🙂
You read your lines well, dearie.
Yeah, and yeah. At this point, a video is no better than an account without some sort of back up in the way of footprints, hair, etc. It’s sad, but true. A video is nothing more than a tantalizing account.
it looks real interesting.
first when the rear end moved i thought bear.
then watching it on a big monitor, i said hmmm…. i see hands moving and arms moving.
interesting.
someone could go back to the spot…. shoot at the same distance and recreate the video.
then compare to see if it could have been a person… vs a bigfoot.
The flip side… it kinda seems odd to me … why was it right there… in plain sight?
What was it doing?
why was it out during the day? in the snow?
dont’ they usually roam around at night?
it seems to be the MO for each of these videos.
step 1 – some randomness
step 2 – focusing on the bigfoot
step 3 – the bigfoot then runs away
still interesting video.