Mistaking a Bear for a Bigfoot?

Posted by: Craig Woolheater on April 26th, 2015

The Hunt Is On: Tuscaloosa woman founds Bigfoot group

Tuscaloosa native Mary Katherine Scruggs said her first encounter with the creature she calls Bigfoot occurred on a warm spring night in 2013. Scruggs’ family lived in a secluded area in northwest Tuscaloosa, where her nearest neighbors are miles away.

Sitting in a swing underneath a grove of oak trees, Scruggs said she and her son, Victor, became alarmed when a long guttural growl penetrated the air from behind their house. Scruggs, who lived in the country all her life, said it sounded like a man being ripped 
to shreds.

A few minutes later, the growl grew closer, coming from behind her house. Scruggs’ five German Shepherds fell silent, she said. Frightened, she and Victor Scruggs fled inside their home.

“We knew nothing about Bigfoot,” Scruggs said. “I wasn’t a believer. I wasn’t a skeptic. I didn’t know anything about it, but then I started watching ‘MonsterQuest’ and ‘Finding Bigfoot.’ I started playing with it in my head.”

Bigfoot sightings have been reported all across North America. Dana Ehret, a paleontologist at The University of Alabama, grew up with stories like the Jersey Devil ingrained into his childhood. Ehret said he finds sightings of Bigfoot fascinating on a social aspect, but he doesn’t believe they 
are real.

“A giant seven-foot primate living in the United States going undetected is just impossible,” he said. “We would have found evidence of it by now. The world is shrinking smaller and smaller. I think a seven-foot-tall primate running around Alabama would be seen pretty quickly.”

Scruggs said the growls surrounding her house continued for the next few weeks, coming from the wood line near her house. She and her husband turned the occurrences into a joke. Every evening she would mimic the yells, and every evening, she said it would yell back at her.

But Scruggs said the growls soon turned aggressive and frightened her. During a bad thunderstorm, Scruggs and her husband were watering their cattle when they were surrounded by screaming so loud, Scruggs said she could feel it vibrating her chest.

Jeffery Lozier, a biologist at the University, said scientists never say anything is impossible, but he, too, is skeptical of the existence of a creature like Bigfoot. Lozier said Scruggs might have encountered a mountain lion. Most people probably could have gone their entire lives in the area, Lozier said, and never have seen one. Every time Lozier goes into the forest, he said, he encounters something he’s never seen before.

One of the reasons Ehret believes people jump to Bigfoot when they hear a strange noise versus an animal like a bobcat is their fascination with the unknown. He said it’s fun to consider these creatures being real, but people should recognize they don’t exist.

A few days later, Scruggs said she saw Bigfoot for the first time. She said she could see the silhouette of the creature squatting in the woods before standing up eight feet in height.

Based on analysis, Lozier suggested Scruggs might have seen a black bear in the woods. Based on sightings and records, the places where Bigfoot would live are the same areas populated by black bears.

“It’s very easy to mistake a bear for something like a Bigfoot,” he said. “A lot of times they will stand up on their hind legs. They actually leave footprints that are very similar when they slide through mud. I imagine if you saw a black bear on it’ hind legs at dusk, your mind would play tricks on you, too.”

Scruggs insisted it wasn’t like any animal she had ever seen. For the next year, she said she was a prisoner within her own home. She refused to go outside by herself, and she made sure she kept a loaded pistol with her at all times.

“I know what I saw,” she said. “Before that, I was always outgoing. Growing up, the woods was my playground.”

Many creatures like Bigfoot were created for a variety of different reasons based in reality, Ehret said. The Griffin, a winged animal in the Middle East, was inspired by dinosaur skeletons, and the cyclops was based on the skulls of elephants.

Ehret thinks Bigfoot could have its origins in Native American lore, which used mythological creatures as part of its belief system, and was passed down from generation to generation over the years. He said creatures like Bigfoot were used to scare people.

In 2009, Lozier wrote an academic paper using Sasquatch as an example to show how convincing species models could be based on questionable inaccurate public data. The tongue-in-cheek paper used eyewitness accounts and footprint recordings to show species distribution for Bigfoot and how many of the sitings could be a case of mistaken identity.

Both Lozier and Ehret said it was possible that a creature like Bigfoot existed billions of years ago. At one time, giant apes and seven-foot grass sloths roamed the earth, but both professors said they don’t believe Bigfoot is going to be found.

Lozier said there’s not enough credible evidence to support Bigfoot. He said there would have to be many Bigfoot creatures running around in the woods to have a sustainable population. The odds of not coming across one, he said, would be unlikely.

“It boggles the mind there wouldn’t be pictures or a dead body or a skeleton,” Lozier said. “We find skeletons of things that have been extinct for millions of years, so why wouldn’t we find a skeleton of a creature that died weeks ago?”

The reason for the recent activity in Tuscaloosa, Scruggs said, is due to deforestation in northern Tuscaloosa. Forests had been stripped to nothing but bare land. She believes they lost their homes and had nowhere else to go.

“I’m not trying to stop the timber cutting,” she said. “They’re welcome to stay there as long as they don’t hurt my dogs. I would love to see some type of law to protect them, so they won’t be harassed.”

Citing several hoaxes involving fake Bigfoot corpses, Ehret said some opportunists use people’s belief in Bigfoot to gain notoriety and fame, but Scruggs, an ordained minister, insisted she isn’t lying.

“Why would I want to destroy my reputation?” Scruggs said. “My words will not change when I stand before the Lord.”

Source

About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005. I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films: OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.


6 Responses to “Mistaking a Bear for a Bigfoot?”

  1. springheeledjack responds:

    This is one of those arguments that continues to rage and I’m not sure why. Yes, I’ll give you: bears are large, furry and they live in the woods. And I would say that yes, probably more than once people have seen a bear and misidentified it as bigfoot.

    On the other hand, it doesn’t hold up as a standard explanation.

    1, if you take the time to look at a bear, while standing, it’s got shorter legs in proportion, and if you’ve ever seen a bear walk on its hind legs you realize that it’s not steady on those legs and it doesn’t walk on its hindlegs for very long. Why? Because bears aren’t bipedal.

    –people who have seen bigfoot for any length of time have seen it moving bipedally, and moving fast, covering a lot of ground quickly. If a bear wants to move fast, it’s going to do it on all fours. Period.

    2, Same with a bears arms. Shorter and not proportionate at all to something bipedal.

    –Sightings concerning BF reference longer arms swinging by its side or even hanging lower than the pelvis. BF sightings include accounts of BFs using its upper limbs to pick up items, dig and other behaviors that is consistent with something bipedal.

    3, there are plenty of sightings that last longer than a few seconds, giving the eye witness time to rule out something like a bear (while I’ll give you, someone not used to being in the woods can easily confuse something at range when they don’t have a lot of outdoor knowledge).

    –There are lots of accounts of hunters and experienced outsdoorspeople having encounters and for a lengthy time to be able to rule out some bear awkwardly walking through the woods.

    Again, if you see something dark at range, nestled amongst the trees, and only for a few seconds, I’d say you cannot definitively prove to me it’s the big guy. However, when you have a sighting that gives you time to watch locomotion and behavior, a bear can be ruled out pretty quickly. Even by novices. Most people know what a bear is, have seen them on TV or at zoos if nowhere else, and as in the case above, she saw something that doesn’t fit the description of animals she’s familiar with.

    And i’m not even addressing the “skeleton” issue except with eye rolling. Obviously Lozier has no clue about how fossils are formed and how decomposition works. Talk about making false assumptions…

  2. SirWilhelm responds:

    A scientist should be skeptical, but not at the expense of questioning eyewitness testimony, especially when they insist that what they saw could not be animals they are familiar with, like bears. Accusing eyewitnesses of hoaxing, while lacking any evidence of a hoax, is just as bad as claiming Bigfoot doesn’t exist, because there is a lack of evidence. The best example of that, is how scientists claim Dark Matter and Dark Energy exist through inferring their effects on visible matter, even though they can’t detect either one with their instruments, which is why they call them “Dark”. We’re supposed to believe them because they are scientists, and their theories are “scientific”. As for skeletons, many skeletons of giant humanoids have been found in North America, most of them in Native American graveyards, and mounds. The Native Americans have stories of interacting with giant humanoids, who they say predated them, on the continent. Some of the skeleton’s discoveries, were reported to the Smithsonian, who sent people to examine them. They boxed up the bones, took them away, and they disappeared in the Smithsonian, like the Ark of the Covenant in Indiana Jones. Read “The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America, The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover Up” by Richard J. Dewhurst, and decide for yourself who you should trust, Lozier, a “scientist”, or the ordained minister, who says she has no reason to lie?

  3. Insanity responds:

    I am going to assume that the statement “…it was possible that a creature like Bigfoot existed billions of years ago. At one time, giant apes and seven-foot grass sloths roamed the earth…” had typo and should have read “…existed millions of years ago…” as the simian primates did not appear in the fossil record until 40 mya.

    I agree with springheeledjack’s points completely.

    Regarding finding remains, while I know bear remains are found, I do not think there is good data to determine how often they are found, or at least specifically a count of bear remains per area per population in that area.

    How many bear remains are found in a given area throughout the year out of the number of bears that die in the same area? 10%, 1%, 0.1% or less?

    What if the percentage of carcasses stumbled upon is 0.1% of what is out there?

    What if the population is very small, smaller than any other species in North America?

    How many cougar remains are found throughout the year?

  4. sasquatch responds:

    I bet a lot of bigfoots have been mistaken for bears at a distance too…so what?

  5. Peter Von Berg responds:

    I cannot believe a biologist would make such boneheaded comments.

  6. DWA responds:

    Anyone who honestly puts forward that this is a sufficient explanation for any of the encounter reports I have read has pronounced himself so thoroughly ignorant of the evidence that I simply stop listening at that point. For example, I didn’t read this blog before posting and grazed the comments quickly. The header was way more than enough.

    SHJ is right. I’d wager to boot that more have seen bigfoot and thought bear than the other way ’round. That’s how our minds work. We don’t see horse and think unicorn.

    No one scores points with me who demands proof, and then tosses off silly and unfounded assumptions as his way of dismissing his obligation to look at the evidence. That’s not a scientist. That’s a blinkered techie.




Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|


Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest

Advertisers



Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin



Advertisement

|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.