Sykes Tells BBC That Not All of the Yeti Samples Are Bear
Posted by: Craig Woolheater on October 18th, 2013
Just because two of the yeti hair samples came back as bear, doesn’t mean all of them did…
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005.
I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films:
OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.
Why didn’t he say so in the first place? Or did he?
I didn’t click on the film. He looks like he’s asleep, and I didn’t want to disturb him.
Craig what impresses me the most in the video is the equanimity of his tone when he talks about the possibility of *other* species of man on the planet.
Other mainstream scientists holding forth on these things positively froth at the gash as smoke pours out their ears their white knuckled hands gesticulate wildly and their fever filled eyes go bdoi-oi-oing out their sockets merely for daring to ask if such a thing’s possible.
alan borky:
Maybe your best post ever.
Wasn’t the term “yeti” originally for more than one creature? And if i remember my reading correctly wasn’t some kind of bear always believed to be one of them?
And wouldn’t it stand to very good reason that a call for yeti dna could turn out results of that creature as well as the more traditional one?
But it raises the question if we have validation of a long thought dead bear still being around to be one of the creatures, was the more traditional yeti a lot of misidentification or given that one large animal could avoid science knowing it was around longer, couldn’t another of similar size do the same?