The Best Bigfootage: Skunk Ape Leaves Greasy Hand Print on Front Door in Florida

Posted by: Craig Woolheater on November 8th, 2014

A lovely couple from the Florida panhandle finds a suspicious, greasy hand print on their front door. Did a Skunk Ape pay them a visit?

#AnimalPlanet #FindingBigfoot

About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005. I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films: OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.


8 Responses to “The Best Bigfootage: Skunk Ape Leaves Greasy Hand Print on Front Door in Florida”

  1. Don responds:

    @ Craig Woolheater, Regarding the handprint on the sliding glass door. Since there was no followup on proving or disproving the existence of dermal ridges/ finger prints or definitive hand size comparisons (I’ve met people with incredibly large hands), by forensic experts. I feel your continued postings about bigfoot fall into the belief only category which lacks severely any critical analysis. To paraphrase – I’m saying you’ll slap anything on your website or fb news feed if it concerns any “SUPPOSED” Bigfoot interaction without screening it or truly using the common sense to validate any of it! To me it appears your becoming a clearinghouse of useless information – videos- stories etc! If you don’t respond then I have my answer.
    After all “No Answer is Still an Answer” !

  2. dconstrukt responds:

    god forbid anyone associated with the show use any ounce of common sense.

    people have something on their property they say keeps leaving gifts of dead animals, and handprints. why not load up a lot of camera traps?

    duh!

  3. Craig Woolheater responds:

    Don Schneider, Cryptomundo is a blog that covers all facets of cryptozoology. It’s not up to me to personally validate every article or video.

    Craig Woolheater

  4. Don responds:

    Well then maybe you should get facts, scientific research and other evidence to support what you think is ” obvious” Craig Woolheater and you wouldn’t be posting unvalidated articles.

  5. dconstrukt responds:

    don you are 100% correct, but you’re preaching to the choir dude.

    I love the topic and visit daily but if we’re being honest here (and the mod’s don’t censor this)… 95% of the stuff posted on here is garbage. (and i’m being overly generous with 95%).

    I come reading, HOPING for some legit stuff… and to me, its worth digging through the garbage because I believe at some point SOMETHING legit will be found and shown… and it WILL be posted on this blog.

    This site is… a place you can come to and read stories on the topic… don’t expect anything to be scientific or valeted here, thats not their job. Its just a blog on the topic filled with stories and videos that are nowhere near real.:)

  6. Craig Woolheater responds:

    Dude, this site is not a scientific journal. It’s a blog that covers news, entertainment and opinion on Cryptozoological topics. Perhaps you should get facts, scientific research and other evidence and start your own website.

  7. dconstrukt responds:

    don, its just a blog on the topic… while I agree in some respects, you’re trying to win a battle you can’t win.

    I think its up to you, us, etc to dig thru all the riff raft and make your own conclusions….

  8. DWA responds:

    You know, Don, just coming from me, I wish that all the people chiming in to call BS would join the chorus asking for the scientific mainstream – who, you know, are responsible for stuff like “facts, scientific research and other evidence” – to step in and tell the rest of us why all this stuff keeps happening.

    I for one am getting sick of hearing that no, they don’t have to do that, it’s up to the proponents to do that. THAT THE PROPONENTS ARE WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS NOT SCIENTISTS – and the ones that are scientists are showing that the evidence has legs – IS THE PROBLEM.

    If you aren’t calling for the scientific mainstream to get involved you are blowing pointless smoke.

    If you are a scientist, and think you have no stake in this, or that you can mouth nonsense just like any other ignoramus, you aren’t worth your degrees. No, that’s a fact. You certainly aren’t a scientist, just a glorified techie.




Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|


Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest

Advertisers



Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin



Advertisement

|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.