Cryptomundo
for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More

3 Responses to “Bigfoot blocks trail *Near abduction*? Chilling account”

1. springheeledjack responds: January 10th, 2015 at 9:36 pm

   I’m curious as to the color of the scarf–in Paulides books a lot of people who go missing are wearing bright colored clothing and a lot of times the color red. For being a potential victim, wearing red would definitely make you stand out in the wilderness–not being a “natural color” of the woods and might draw attention.

   That might be another possible attractant–putting something red up in the forest (with cameras or people in tree stands with cameras) and see what it draws.

   I think there’s a possibility you may be onto something with the high frequency sound and dogs–in many cases, either the dogs cower under porches or run indoors, or they go running off in the woods after whatever is going on out there–and yes, an awful lot of times it’s to the detriment of the human involved.

   Interesting story.

2. KernalPanic responds: January 12th, 2015 at 3:25 am

   It’s low frequency that scares animals and makes them want to flee. Many large land mammals use infrasound to communicate and even to scare away predators. To another animal it’s like that thumping base feeling in your chest when a lowrider car goes by with their woofers blaring. A human might react in a similar fashion…they get creeped out and have a very uneasy feeling and just want to get the hell out of there.

   I noticed that Paulides mentions many of the missing people were wearing red. To an apex predator, that color might suggest that the person is injured and vulnerable because to them, red is the color of blood.

   Why do researchers today insist that Sasquatch is a “big, lovable, forest friend” that wouldn’t harm a fly? Why is thousands of years of natives people’s information about them discarded? Most of the indigenous tribes claim that these creatures are cannibals and dangerous but I guess that doesn’t fit in todays “Forest Brother” bias. Perhaps it scares the shit out of us and we still want to believe that we are the biggest baddest predator out there when we never really were. A form of mass delusion I guess.

   Tonight on “Finding Bigfoot” one of the cast members said,”they’re interested in children because children are non-threatening”….or maybe, more plausibly, children are simply easy pickings to a large predator. Children are less likely to have a weapon, they are easy to run down, less likely to notice when they are being stalked and they come in a tasty portable size just right for carrying off. I think Bigfoot is an opportunistic feeder and reportedly takes advantage of meat freezers, farm animals, deer feeders, campsites, etc and yes…probably the occasional human. Why is that never, ever a supposition?

3. Goodfoot responds: January 12th, 2015 at 10:03 pm

   I remember that guy. He used to sell homemade moccasins down at Haight and Cole. He was manager of THE ELECTRIC PRUNES for a time.

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|