Cryptomundo
for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More

3 Responses to “Dr. Squatch Refutes Thomas Steenburg”

1. PhotoExpert responds: April 14th, 2015 at 10:37 pm

   This guy and his explanations are so far off base that he should not be called Dr. Squatch but Dr. Squat!

   First of all, during the video, we the viewers see all these old broken trees and some newly broken trees. We also see quite a bit of mud. The ground is so saturated, we actually see the landscape dotted with little pools of water. But what we do no see are any Bigfoot prints. Not a single one! Because of the amount of mud and water still there, the most logical explanation is that a pretty sizable storm recently rolled through the area with some force. That would account for the freshly broken tree limbs scattered about. Proof of that happening are the broken tree limbs, the mud, the pools of water, etc.That is the most logical explanation for any rationale human being. But not for this guy! He states it must be a Sasquatch. Then where sir are the footprints? All that mud and not one single Bigfoot print. Explain that! I can, a storm passed through and the evidence confirms that. Your lack of footprint evidence proves it was not a Bigfoot.

   Secondly, the plastic bags are not markers of any kind. I have seen this hundreds of time. Newton states that an object in motion will tend to stay in motion, until acted upon by an outside force. As the wind blew the bags around, they were stopped by the outside force of the rough bark of those twigs sticking out. Wind follows patterns. So we would expect to find several plastic bags in the same area. They were not placed there by Bigfoot!

   Thirdly, I thought Bigfoots were secretive and shied away from human contact. So why would a Bigfoot show up at that location. That area has such a heavy human presence that the sound of the cars whizzing buy actually interfered with your video. For goodness sake, you filmed a steady stream of them passing by. Not a good place for a Bigfoot or human to cross. But you ignored that fact and started saying some dead branch was a marker for Bigfoot to cross there. If Bigfoot exists, the creature would be more intelligent than to tell other Bigfoots to cross a busy road and mark that crossing. Ridiculous!

   Fourthly, everywhere you panned your camera, there was a building or man made structure in the background. Why would Bigfoots gather and lay markers in such a heavily populated area? Not typical Bigfoot behavior for a Bigfoot, Dr. Squat!

   Fifthly, I noticed some mesh logs laid about. How did they get there Dr. Squat? It would take many grown men to bring those in. But they were not carried there by any group of men. They certainly were not laid there by a Bigfoot. They were brought in by maybe a couple of men. And they brought them in on a tractor! You know, the kind they use to cut a field of grass. In fact, probably a tractor very similar to the one used to cut the baseball field we see in the background that you point out. The cutting blade on the tractor was raised a couple of inches to clear the ground, the mesh laid across that and then brought there and laid down. The raised cutting blade was responsible for knocking down or bending those hundreds of pieces of grass. One Bigfoot did not do that! Nor did a troop of Bigfoots. This was done on a dry or drier day so the tractor did not get caught up in the mud. That is why you see no tractor tread marks. And that is the same reason you inexplicably see no Bigfoot prints. That’s because Bigfoot did not do this.

   But Dr. Squat, you certainly use Bigfoot being responsible for every natural occurrence you see. Even if the facts contradict your belief, you give credit to Bigfoot. Ever wonder why your secretly hidden camera in that mesh, never captured any Bigfoot activity? Because Bigfoot can not be attributed to these naturally occurring or man made happenings. Only a BELIEVER would jump to such ludicrous conclusions.

   I give you obvious answers but you are in denial because they go against your predetermined beliefs. My observations confirm the facts at hand. You provide no evidence of Bigfoot involvement and provide no data or evidence to contradict your belief, I mean theory. No, I was right the first time–your belief!

   Thomas Steenburg is correct! You are wrong! And the evidence is clear. My explanation accounts for what we see. For your explanation to be correct, we would have to believe that Bigfoot is not a secretive animal that avoids humans but seeks them out actively. We would have to believe that Bigfoot is as light as a feather and that while it is tearing down fresh tree limbs, that same body mass does not leave one print in all that mud and saturated earth. We would have to believe that Bigfoot wants other Bigfoots to put their lives in jeopardy and marks a pathway to cross a super busy road.

   Your theory contradicts everything that is reported about Bigfoot. You are simply wrong. You are incorrect. Logical explanations support everything we see in your video. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And you have provided none to back up your claims. That is because your claims are biased and that of a believer. I bet you could attribute a pebble in the field being placed there by Bigfoot. LOL

2. Insanity responds: April 15th, 2015 at 11:10 am

   This doesn’t really disprove Steenburg in any fashion. Eliminate all possibilities that the bags aren’t random trash. Being unable to inspect the site myself and make my own conclusions on the breaks, it’s difficult to accept the conclusion that none were made by natural processes or people.

3. David-Australia responds: April 15th, 2015 at 5:32 pm

   “THOMAS STEENBURG CLAIMS THAT BIGFOOT ARE NOT MARKING THE WOODS WITH STRUCTURES AND TWISTS”

   He makes no such 100% absolute claim at all.

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|