Cryptomundo
for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More

2 Responses to “ThinkerThunker – Cloaking Bigfoot with Barb and Gabby”

1. PhotoExpert responds: October 14th, 2014 at 2:11 am

   LOL @ ThinkerThunker again. Thanks for the laughs ThinkerThunker!

   What’s that? He was being serious? OMG These poor deluded people.

   Everything they see is a BF. Whether it is leaves moving, a digital anomaly, or a small creature in the woods–they try to relate it to a BF.

   At least ThinkerThunker did not narrow down our choices to a BF or an expensive animatronic head this time. No, he did not do that. Now he has narrowed down the possibility of it only being a “cloaking Sasquatch”.

   Pssst, ThinkerThunker, there is experimental cloaking devices that bend light as a technology today. They are working on it. And yes, it worked, on a molecular level. So how much do you think a cloaking device costs versus an animatronic head? You are going further and further into the land of fantasy.

   ThinkerThunker, why couldn’t the movement you saw have been an escaped circus bear with a cloaking device. We know bears exist and we know bears are smart, especially circus bears. All that escaped circus bear would have to do is what your alleged BF did and get some cloaking technology. That possibility is certainly more feasible than your cloaked BF theory. But it just doesn’t sound right to you does it? Why? Because you could not relate that to your unfounded conclusion that it is a BF.

   And one more word of advice: I would suggest buying a more up to date video cam. You would be surprised how inexpensive the new video equipment has become. And I have a feeling, if you get the new video equipment, your cloaking BFs will disappear. Maybe that is why you still hold on to the older video equipment? Hmm, interesting.

   And in the second video, the witness saw a small black think scurry down a tree, correct? Any black bears in your area? You do know that baby black bears climb trees, right? So your witnesses and the enabler shooting the video tell the witness she had a sighting of a baby BF. No way it could be a baby black bear up a tree with the mother nearby. If I were you, you should alert your crew to that more sane possibility and take caution.

   I see no evidence of a probably or even possible BF, baby or grown, in any of these videos. Although your analysis was much better than previous videos and you took out the possibility of an expensive animatronic head, you still lost me. You lost me when you took that extra step and try to imply an alleged BF has obtained some cloaking device. LOL

   You almost had me agreeing with some of your initial analysis. For the first time ever, I thought maybe this guy was going to be objective. But then you started making the evidence subjective to fit into your theory of a cloaking BF.

   Please tell me why it was not a cloaking escaped circus bear and why it must have been a cloaking BF. I am dying to hear your answer!

   Please, I invite the comedic relief!

2. hoodoorocket responds: October 14th, 2014 at 2:41 pm

   @photoexpert:

   I have a confession to make. I have never figured out if Thinkthunker is supposed to be tongue in cheek (“taking the piss” as they say in the UK), or if we are supposed to take him seriously.

   I always figured if I saw more of his stuff I could figure it out but life is too short not to be watching

   keyboard cat

   instead.

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|