Why “Big Red” is a Real Sasquatch

Posted by: Christopher Noël on June 30th, 2015

Since it was shot in Ontario in September of 2013, Timbergiantbigfoot’s footage has taken a lot of heat from short-sighted detractors. And yet, it shows a genuine Sasquatch and deserves a great deal more recognition. The only way this is not a Sasquatch is if it’s a gorilla. But wait, gorillas aren’t red. Okay, the only way this is not a Sasquatch is if it’s an orangutan and her baby…in an Ontario forest.

See the original footage here.

See also:

Canadian Sasquatch Encounter Caught on Video
About That Canadian Sasquatch Encounter Caught on Video…
ThinkerThunker – Timbergiantbigfoot – New Discoveries!!!

Christopher Noël About Christopher Noël
Christopher Noël is the author of Sasquatch Rising 2013 and editor of the newly released anthology How Sasquatch Matters: Writers Respond to the New Natural Order. Christopher Noël holds a Master’s degree in Philosophy from Yale. Noël is a freelance editor (ChristopherNoel.info) and lives with his daughter in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom.

10 Responses to “Why “Big Red” is a Real Sasquatch”

  1. cryptokellie responds:

    The only way this is not a Sasquatch is because it’s not. Go to the original footage and view and hear the audio. The archetypal Bigfoot hoax video. Shaky camera moving all over and ending before a good look is obtained with the usual “look at that” audio commentary by the person videoing. The idea that anyone would attempt the wood knocking maneuver while trying to film a Bigfoot at close range puts this one over the top.
    Of course Thinker Thunker proves the validity of this footage. This is old news…

  2. dconstrukt responds:

    they must be seeing something totally different than I’m seeing… cuz I don’t see anything they’re talking about or drawing.

    this is 100% a case of you see what you want to see.

    the “baby face”? I don’t see it.

    a bigfoot?

    I don’t see it either.

    why can’t it be a bear or other known animal?

    why do they insist its a bigfoot?


    The problem here is… this is shot by AND edited by people who ARE LOOKING for bigfoot.

    This 10,000% is BIAS.

    Google it if you don’t know what it is.

    When you have bias, your mind works in an intereting way, you will try to justify your belief even if its not correct, you will try to support it and twist things to support that believe.

    You can’t sit here and tell anyone with a straight face this is 100% a bigfoot, because its simply not true and the video doesn’t say otherwise.

    If you are, you’re lying to yourself and refuse to believe the truth.

    The truth for you, is what you believe. You go out LOOKING for a bigfoot, you believe most, if not everything you see that you can’t explain IS a bigfoot… case in point here.

  3. bamaboy responds:

    Aren’t you the same guy that was backing up Rick Dyer?

  4. Raiderpithicusblaci responds:

    ThinkerThunker has solved yet another mystery; it’s ridiculousness like this that provides cannon for nitwits like this rabble; they are all a total waste of oxygen.

  5. Goodfoot responds:

    And if you don’t want to see anything……?

  6. PhotoExpert responds:

    Hmmm, blurry video with no background data or proper vetting, must be a BF!

    It is interesting that the narrator of this video refers to StinkerStunker as an expert in video analysis. For me, that sealed the deal–anything but a BF shown in this video.

    It is also interesting that one of the “expert video analysts” thought the rear end was the head on a baby BF and the other thought the exact opposite. Which proves my point conclusively… that these analysts do not know their head from their ass (pun intended). And therefore, make asses of themselves during their analysis of various alleged BF videos!

    I can only add that I am in agreement with both Cryptokellie and dconstrukt. Excellent posts, both of you!

    I have been preaching this for years here on Cryptomundo, about remaining objective during any type of analysis. And dconstrukt posted such an simple yet eloquent post about objectivity and how bias skews analysis into subjective beliefs!

    Well said dconstrukt and Cryptokellie!

  7. dconstrukt responds:

    thanks… I hate to come off like a prick or like so negative… but i mean the stuff thats out there is JUNK.

    and I WANT to believe these things are real.

    I REALLY do.

    my friends think i’m an idiot for watching and going to these sites.

    but I don’t care.

    I feel like there IS something out there…

    but i mean the level of proof is so absurdly garbage its mind boggling.

    I’m just trying to use some common sense here and my understanding of the way the human mind works, and putting 1+1 together.

    Hope we get some good stuff soon… I mean strap a go pro on your chest and you’ve got instant eyes… but I know seeing one of these things, if they are real, can happen in the blink of an eye and probably 99% of the time is totally random… like the people aren’t setting out to find these things… it just kinda “happens.

  8. sasquatch responds:

    I think it’s an owl…look at the ear tuft in the upper right corner and the feathery look of it…the movements are very quick and bird-like…so this may be an owl with a rat or small rabbit or squirrel maybe…The scale of the leaves would follow as well.

  9. shownuff responds:

    This is such crap. You can draw circles all you want but I don’t see what these people see. It’s not clear. And to be honest the guy doing the narrating of the video believe that big foots have mystical powers and can teleport. So out the door with these wackos. Just cause you write a book or go into the forest with a camera and hoax videos does not make people legit. Especially if they have been caught hoaxing and brought to there attention and they still act like that never happened. And since the people are so nice then we are not allowed to question. People get attacked rite away. Which tells me the same person who is getting upset when you question the work. Has to be related or if not is the same person who runs the channel. Timber and the other dude from Canada are full of it. One does puppets while the other never shows his face makes photo videos with background grunts. And bigfoots are invisible. Please people stop sipping that Purple Drank.

  10. dconstrukt responds:

    lol so true.

    I can get some ghostwriter to write me a bigfoot book for $100-300… get a nice cover made… put my name on it and sell it on amazon… and then I SHOULD be a bigfoot expert, no? 🙂

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|

Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest


Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin


|Top | FarBar|

Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.