Meldrum Responds: Critical Examination of Standing/Sylvanic Bigfoot Videos

Posted by: Craig Woolheater on December 4th, 2014

In August, Daniel Falconer and Phil Poling issued a critical paper to analyse Todd Standing’s claimed bigfoot videos.

That paper was published here on Cryptomundo: Critical Examination of Standing/Sylvanic Bigfoot Videos


Dr. Jeff Meldrum has issued a response to this critical paper:

I have been challenged and badgered to respond to the criticisms aimed at Todd Standings images. So today I set things aside and wrote a quick and dirty response to Falconer and Poling report. I still have not drawn a conclusion myself, but I am certainly not convinced by their arguments that these are definitely hoaxed. I continue to be dismayed by the tenuous arguments and baseless certitude by so many on this. A lot more work needs to be done.

Let me reiterate — neither my visit to Nordegg for a few days, nor my co-hosting, what I thought turned out to be a very interesting radio show, constitute an endorsement of everything else that Todd has done. I am still considering the evidence.

~ Don Jeffrey Meldrum


Here a few samples pages:



Download the 22 page, 1.6 MB file here: A BRIEF AND LIMITED RESPONSE

About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005. I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films: OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.

2 Responses to “Meldrum Responds: Critical Examination of Standing/Sylvanic Bigfoot Videos”

  1. Goodfoot responds:

    Yeah, Doc, the Obama “transformation” sure is just as convincing as the Todd Standing version!

    Are you kidding me? A little defensiveness is understandable. We all do it. I guess I need to read the entire rebuttal.

    Oh lord. Do I have to?

  2. Goodfoot responds:

    Well, I read it. I must say I’m rather aghast, and disappointed as well. Weak. In my opinion, accusations of fakery are strengthened, not weakened, by Dr. Meldrum’s “rebuttal”.

Sorry. Comments have been closed.

|Top | Content|

Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest


Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin


|Top | FarBar|

Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.