Meldrum Responds: Critical Examination of Standing/Sylvanic Bigfoot Videos

Posted by: Craig Woolheater on December 4th, 2014

In August, Daniel Falconer and Phil Poling issued a critical paper to analyse Todd Standing’s claimed bigfoot videos.

That paper was published here on Cryptomundo: Critical Examination of Standing/Sylvanic Bigfoot Videos

falcpol1

Dr. Jeff Meldrum has issued a response to this critical paper:

I have been challenged and badgered to respond to the criticisms aimed at Todd Standings images. So today I set things aside and wrote a quick and dirty response to Falconer and Poling report. I still have not drawn a conclusion myself, but I am certainly not convinced by their arguments that these are definitely hoaxed. I continue to be dismayed by the tenuous arguments and baseless certitude by so many on this. A lot more work needs to be done.

Let me reiterate — neither my visit to Nordegg for a few days, nor my co-hosting, what I thought turned out to be a very interesting radio show, constitute an endorsement of everything else that Todd has done. I am still considering the evidence.

~ Don Jeffrey Meldrum

meld1

Here a few samples pages:

meld2

meld3

Download the 22 page, 1.6 MB file here: A BRIEF AND LIMITED RESPONSE

About Craig Woolheater
Co-founder of Cryptomundo in 2005. I have appeared in or contributed to the following TV programs, documentaries and films: OLN's Mysterious Encounters: "Caddo Critter", Southern Fried Bigfoot, Travel Channel's Weird Travels: "Bigfoot", History Channel's MonsterQuest: "Swamp Stalker", The Wild Man of the Navidad, Destination America's Monsters and Mysteries in America: Texas Terror - Lake Worth Monster, Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoot: Return to Boggy Creek and Beast of the Bayou.


2 Responses to “Meldrum Responds: Critical Examination of Standing/Sylvanic Bigfoot Videos”

  1. Goodfoot responds:

    Yeah, Doc, the Obama “transformation” sure is just as convincing as the Todd Standing version!

    Are you kidding me? A little defensiveness is understandable. We all do it. I guess I need to read the entire rebuttal.

    Oh lord. Do I have to?

  2. Goodfoot responds:

    Well, I read it. I must say I’m rather aghast, and disappointed as well. Weak. In my opinion, accusations of fakery are strengthened, not weakened, by Dr. Meldrum’s “rebuttal”.




Leave your comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

|Top | Content|


Connect with Cryptomundo

Cryptomundo FaceBook Cryptomundo Twitter Cryptomundo Instagram Cryptomundo Pinterest

Advertisers



Creatureplica Fouke Monster Sybilla Irwin



Advertisement

|Top | FarBar|



Attention: This is the end of the usable page!
The images below are preloaded standbys only.
This is helpful to those with slower Internet connections.